New (possible loach) baby mystery!
Moderator: LoachForumModerators
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
Update 03-01-2007:
If this is indeed a little Sewellia sp. spotted, then I wonder if the fact that it is still not clinging to anything is because the pectoral and ventral fins are developing at a much slower rate than those of juvenile Sewellia lineolata? In this last photograph, you can see the gap between the fins quite clearly. I think it's quite likely that this fish is probably as yet unable to create the 'suction' needed.
Emma
If this is indeed a little Sewellia sp. spotted, then I wonder if the fact that it is still not clinging to anything is because the pectoral and ventral fins are developing at a much slower rate than those of juvenile Sewellia lineolata? In this last photograph, you can see the gap between the fins quite clearly. I think it's quite likely that this fish is probably as yet unable to create the 'suction' needed.
Emma
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
- helen nightingale
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
- Location: London, UK
If it is a a spotted sewellia, does that mean that adult spotties go downstream to lay their eggs, or do the babies get washed downstream untill they are bigger and have grown fins big enough to keep them sucking, and then they swim back to faster flowing water?
it is a very sweet baby, and you really do take amazing pictures
it is a very sweet baby, and you really do take amazing pictures
- Graeme Robson
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:34 am
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- helen nightingale
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
- Location: London, UK
- helen nightingale
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
- Location: London, UK
- Graeme Robson
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:34 am
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
No information at hand. I've lost a load of pdf papers with my computer Blowing up.
You can see here, how the eggs would be released down the river. Even if they find a area to dig?, water movement would intervene. Unless they mirgrate....
http://www.loaches.com/articles/sewelli ... -aquariums
Emma, I'll have to bug you for some pdf papers. I'll e-mail you soon....Pretty please
You can see here, how the eggs would be released down the river. Even if they find a area to dig?, water movement would intervene. Unless they mirgrate....
http://www.loaches.com/articles/sewelli ... -aquariums
Emma, I'll have to bug you for some pdf papers. I'll e-mail you soon....Pretty please
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
I've got 2 things to report today!
First off, I have seen the baby appearing to try and sort of cling to a cobble a couple of times today. Here's a pic:
It didn't stay in this position for very long time, just sort of sliding back down to the sand.
And the 2nd thing I have to report is more baby news! Earlier in this evening, I was sitting in front of the tank drying my hair (!) when I noticed a tiny movement from over the back of the right hand side of the tank (the opposite side to where the first mystery fry hangs about). It was another one of the same, except so much smaller - 5mm TL absolute tops. So it is clearly from another spawning, , and is absolutely weeny. Here is a pretty naff pic, but you can see the solid stripes and tiny size:
I'm a bit concerned about this one as it is a lot smaller than the other one was when I first spotted it, and it is already foraging about out in the open. This side of the tank is also where the two Schistura lounge about too, so I hope it manages to stay out of their way.
Anyway, I'm really chuffed at this second spawning. Will have to check the filter again soon, just in case!
Emma
First off, I have seen the baby appearing to try and sort of cling to a cobble a couple of times today. Here's a pic:
It didn't stay in this position for very long time, just sort of sliding back down to the sand.
And the 2nd thing I have to report is more baby news! Earlier in this evening, I was sitting in front of the tank drying my hair (!) when I noticed a tiny movement from over the back of the right hand side of the tank (the opposite side to where the first mystery fry hangs about). It was another one of the same, except so much smaller - 5mm TL absolute tops. So it is clearly from another spawning, , and is absolutely weeny. Here is a pretty naff pic, but you can see the solid stripes and tiny size:
I'm a bit concerned about this one as it is a lot smaller than the other one was when I first spotted it, and it is already foraging about out in the open. This side of the tank is also where the two Schistura lounge about too, so I hope it manages to stay out of their way.
Anyway, I'm really chuffed at this second spawning. Will have to check the filter again soon, just in case!
Emma
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
-
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:15 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Martin Thoene
- Posts: 11186
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
- Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998
And here's me frustrated because the apparent spawning I saw a couple of weeks ago seems to have come to nought
The day before yesterday I repeated the trigger procedure. 5-% water-change, fresh almond leaves in the filter. The water went clody with tannins, the fish went nuts again So we'll see.
If I see some more S. lineolata I'm going to get another male. I think this guy is lazy because he has no competition.
I'm pleased for you Emma. I'll keep my fingers crossed for its survival.
Martin.
The day before yesterday I repeated the trigger procedure. 5-% water-change, fresh almond leaves in the filter. The water went clody with tannins, the fish went nuts again So we'll see.
If I see some more S. lineolata I'm going to get another male. I think this guy is lazy because he has no competition.
I'm pleased for you Emma. I'll keep my fingers crossed for its survival.
Martin.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
Thank you's! I have seen the little one again today, so hopefully it knows how to stay safe.
Martin, it looks like we'll both have crossed fingers, as mine are crossed for you and your Sewellia. I think adding to the group with another male is a good idea. I have been wondering if the the fact that mine are spawning so regularly now is because of the size group I keep, with several of both sexes in this group.
Emma
Martin, it looks like we'll both have crossed fingers, as mine are crossed for you and your Sewellia. I think adding to the group with another male is a good idea. I have been wondering if the the fact that mine are spawning so regularly now is because of the size group I keep, with several of both sexes in this group.
Emma
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
- Jim Powers
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana
WOW!! Emma!! That is great!! Checking that filter now might be a good idea.
Martin, I think adding the extra male is a great idea. I have Sewellia in two tanks. One tank has a male and female and the other two males and a female. There is definately more jousting and the like in the tank with two males. In the other tank, there is very little interaction between the male and female Sewellia. I still think you will be finding some tiny Sewellia when you least expect it. Fingers are crossed.
Martin, I think adding the extra male is a great idea. I have Sewellia in two tanks. One tank has a male and female and the other two males and a female. There is definately more jousting and the like in the tank with two males. In the other tank, there is very little interaction between the male and female Sewellia. I still think you will be finding some tiny Sewellia when you least expect it. Fingers are crossed.
Great news Emma
Not wanting to hijack your thread but on reading the most recent posts do you think it may be better for me to consider 2 males and 4 females or 3 males and 3 females of one species rather than 2 trios of 2 seperate species for my small river tank
Not wanting to hijack your thread but on reading the most recent posts do you think it may be better for me to consider 2 males and 4 females or 3 males and 3 females of one species rather than 2 trios of 2 seperate species for my small river tank
Pardon my honesty - I am a Northerner
14 loach species bred, which will be next?
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 115 guests