Three more new Gastromyzon

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

User avatar
Bagrus dude
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:14 pm

Three more new Gastromyzon

Post by Bagrus dude »

Tan, HH & CUM Leh, 2006. Three new species of Gastromyzon (Teleostei: Balitoridae) from southern Sarawak. Zootaxa 1126: 1–19.

Abstract
User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene »

Suddenly...it's raining Gastromyzon!

You know the next request..... :lol:

P-lease (if you have the pdf). That abstract sounds most interesting.

m_thoene@rogers.com

TIA, Martin :P
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image
User avatar
Graeme Robson
Posts: 9096
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:34 am
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Graeme Robson »

User avatar
Jim Powers
Posts: 5208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Bloomington, Indiana

Post by Jim Powers »

Me too, Please!! :D

jimpowers@prodigy.net
User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner »

Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image
User avatar
Tony T.
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:21 pm

Post by Tony T. »

Is G. ridens redescribed? In OD of G. ridens it has 56-78 scales in lateral series and truncate snout.
Last edited by Tony T. on Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bagrus dude
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:14 pm

Post by Bagrus dude »

Without looking at the paper (yet), I would guess that the type series of G. ridens consists of more than one species. It is not inconceivable that the paratypes of G. ridens from Sarawak are not conspecific with the holotype (56–78 scales seems an unusually high variation and one would suspect that there is more than a single species involved).
User avatar
Tony T.
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:21 pm

Post by Tony T. »

Anyone got the paper yet? I agree that the variation on scale # of ridens are a bit high [but not impossible and depend on many factors, and there might be similar problem for G. aeroides too], but any other character to separate it from the new species?
User avatar
Hendra
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:54 am
Location: South Kalimantan, Indonesia

Post by Hendra »

Still in waiting, Khun Tony. 8)
User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene »

Whoopee! Just got the pdf of these descriptions from Bagrusdude and Dr. Tan Heok Hui almost simultaneously!

Now this document is really interesting :)

Martin.
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image
User avatar
Jim Powers
Posts: 5208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Bloomington, Indiana

Post by Jim Powers »

Just got mine from Bagrusdude and I agree, it IS very interesting.
I wonder if any of these newly described species (particularly scitulus) have already shown up on the market?
User avatar
Graeme Robson
Posts: 9096
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:34 am
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Graeme Robson »

Jim. If my eyes are working correctly, then i keep 3 of these G. scitulus and our lfs has over 20 of them in stock. Hmm......
User avatar
Hendra
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:54 am
Location: South Kalimantan, Indonesia

Post by Hendra »

Hmmm........... too...... :!:
User avatar
Jim Powers
Posts: 5208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Bloomington, Indiana

Post by Jim Powers »

I'm thinking one of mine is a scitulus. I also think Martin might have some too.
Mark in Vancouver
Posts: 14252
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Location: British Columbia

Post by Mark in Vancouver »

Can someone please forward the pdf to me? Please and thank you.
Your vantage point determines what you can see.
Post Reply