ID help

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave Rinaldo
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Austin, Texas

ID help

Post by Dave Rinaldo »

10cm TL (single specimen)
Image
Image
Image
How do you keep the music playing...
Legrand/Bergman
Diana
Posts: 4675
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:35 am
Location: Near San Franciso

Post by Diana »

http://www.loaches.com/species-index/pi ... ored-large

Related, but not the same, is my guess. However, the spot pattern can vary quite a lot.

Very nice looking!
38 tanks, 2 ponds over 4000 liters of water to keep clean and fresh.

Happy fish keeping!
User avatar
Thomas
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:25 am
Location: Aachen, Germany
Contact:

Post by Thomas »

Yes, but the right genus is "Misgurnus" and not "Misgurnis" as in the link. I would say it is a nice spotted male of M. anguillicaudatus.
User avatar
Dave Rinaldo
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by Dave Rinaldo »

I've had this fish for over five years and it is very slender.

I would never buy a 'dojo' on pupose 8)
How do you keep the music playing...
Legrand/Bergman
Katy
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Vermont, USA

Post by Katy »

I was wondering about some sort of cobitis (but I am a newbie)

Whatever it is it is GORGEOUS!
User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene »

Thomas wrote:Yes, but the right genus is "Misgurnus" and not "Misgurnis" as in the link. I would say it is a nice spotted male of M. anguillicaudatus.
Well spotted Thomas :wink:

I have fixed the spelling mistakes.

Martin.
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image
User avatar
Thomas
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:25 am
Location: Aachen, Germany
Contact:

Post by Thomas »

Hi Martin,

Glad to hear it is only a mistake and not a revision that I've missed...

please can you do the same in the alphabetical species index? In the descriptions self is it right. Sorry Dave for the Offtopic.

Thomas
Post Reply