Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:31 pm
by Emma Turner
Mad Duff wrote:
Another one that should be added to the species gallery!

Is that ok Mark?
Emma
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:54 pm
by Mad Duff
Yeah no probs Em

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:37 pm
by Mike Ophir
Wow, nice photos Mark. In my experience keeping B. rostrata, their markings become more and more variable as they age. I had some specimens that became extremely reticulated like the one in the photo above. Others retained their vertical barred patterning. Interesting to note!
Mike
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:11 am
by Emma Turner
Thanks Mark, I added the pic to the gallery.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:38 am
by Mad Duff
Thanks Mike, I have noticed quite a bit of pattern change in these since I got them, it will be interesting to see if the pattern still alters after they stop growing.
Thanks Emma

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:00 am
by piggy4
Hi Mark, thanks for the pics , the fish on pics 3 and 5 show loads more anatamosis than the others , do you think this is possibly a sexual trait ?
The fish on pic 6 is still enigmatic really , and could prove to be a different fish ? these were first spotted as bycatches with B. histrionica .
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:00 am
by mickthefish
just reviving this thread to show you piggy4's rostrata, it's the best i could do as they knew i wanted to get a shot of them and they kept hiding.

he's got loads of them, all different patterns.
mick
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:21 pm
by Mike Ophir
Interesting photo. Definetly reminds me of B. almorhae to some extent. Interesting to see how these two species often resemble each other as they age.
Mike
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:13 pm
by piggy4
Superb pic Mick
Mike these Rostrata's aren't actually that big or old , they are similar to Almorhae's but i think they are a little shorter in the face ? though having said that i suspect the males will develope a longer snout as they grow !