Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:41 pm
by Martin Thoene
shari2 wrote:rools smools!
...
and why does jersey get picked on all the time anyway???
besides, I only see one guess...muwhahahah!
You deleted it you bum!
4) NJ residents do not make up their own rules.
And.....you're ALL wrong
Martin.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:48 pm
by Mark in Vancouver
1961. I know it is!
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:24 pm
by Martin Thoene
I know it isn't.
Martin.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:35 pm
by Emma Turner
Martin, Steve has been bugging me to give an answer from him.
He reckons 1952. He'd better not be right or I'll never hear the end of it....
Emma
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:34 pm
by Martin Thoene
You may take great delight in telling him that he's WRONG!
Martin.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:39 pm
by The Kapenta Kid
It's tomorrow now here, altho it may not be so where you are yet. I say 1936 and if that is not elegible today, relay it to tomorrow wherever you are,
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:46 pm
by Martin Thoene
Here today in your yesterday it's still as wrong as it will be in my tomorrow.....or your next week.
Martin.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:52 pm
by shari2
I know what it is. Martin made the thing up just to get us. Remember the April Fool hillie? Sneaky, he is.
...and that was NOT a date guess so your rools don't apply
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:59 pm
by Dr. Momfish
♪ ♪ ♪ nya nya nya nya nyaaaaaaaa nya.
i know the answer.
and i'm not telling.....
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:01 pm
by Martin Thoene
shari2 wrote:I know what it is. Martin made the thing up just to get us. Remember the April Fool hillie? Sneaky, he is.
...and that was NOT a date guess so your rools don't apply
NO.....it's as real as your implication of a date. As you did not specify a particular year, your guess for tomorrow is still available for your exclusive useage should you choose to take further part in this competition.
5) NJ residents may not be cheeky to the competition adjudicator.
Martin.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:03 pm
by TammyLiz
It does have a 50's feel. But I'm thinking it is a niche-type of the thing so wouldn't worry about it looking too professional. And the feel of the article is so laid back, like they have nothing better to do. Maybe 1962? Being unfamiliar with the exact history of Britain's economy and such, I have to admit that I'm being influenced by what was going on in the US.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:31 pm
by Martin Thoene
.....errr...NO!
Martin.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:32 am
by angelfish83
1938
Thats mean
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:39 am
by Mark Janssen
1964
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:50 am
by Mark Janssen
hmm i've done some research and if martin calls it "the aquarist" instead of "the Aquarist & Pondkeeper" it may be a hint of being prior 1946 since in that plubication year it name changed to "(the) Aquarist & Pondkeeper"