Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:46 pm
by shari2
Thanks. The pattern below the lateral line is clearly different, as is the pectoral fin patterning. The nose profile is also more elongate.
they are handsome fish. more pics are definitely called for in the future.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:47 pm
by Jim Powers
By the way, Martin. How are these guys doing?
I bet at 3", they are very impressive. Sort of like a burly L. disparis.
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:34 pm
by Martin Thoene
Doing good Jim. They're in with the
Schistura balteata and have filled out a little. Seem to be grazing on the bogwood and picking up bits of food. They're not visual hunters like
Homaloptera smithi for instance. More taste and smell searchers for food. They ate some bloodworm yesterday.
Just took this of the largest one. Not quite "burly", but certainly longer than my biggest
L. disparis ever was.
Martin.
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:10 pm
by Jim Powers
They are looking good!
They sound as if they forage much like L. disparis.
My largest female L. disparis were very impressive at about 2" long so I imagine these are really something especially after you fatten them up a bit. Although, they don't appear to be that thin to begin with.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:23 am
by Emma Turner
Shari,
I think I have some pics somewhere of one of them after quite a time spent in our River Tank. Might still be on the old computer though, will take a bit of time to dig them out.
Glad to see that your new additions are doing well, Martin.
Emma
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:35 am
by Graeme Robson
Your last picture is
Stunning, Martin.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:45 pm
by Martin Thoene
Thanks Graeme. As I continually get such comments with 3.2 Mp camera, I'm seriously reconsidering my planned camera upgrade. This Canon A70 has taken over 10,000 pictures in 3 years and only just has given me a minor problem. VERY reliable and I know the works really well.
I was thinking Canon Rebel XTi DSLR which is 10.1 Mp and around $1000. I don't know that the standard lens will give me good Macro capability. The majority of my photography is closeup fish stuff, so do I need a big hunk of SLR? Do I want to spend maybe another $500 on a good closeup lens? I've used a regular SLR before and they're OK at home, but a PITA when you go out with the camera. If you want to do bird photography like Mark they're undoubtedly what you need however.
I don't, so now I'm looking at the Canon A640 which is 10.1Mp, a wee bit bigger than my A70, but much faster operating and available for around $650. I can bung in a 1 GB card for around $100 and get everything I need. So it's possible I can play with more than 3 times the Mp with a camera that I can learn really quickly.
Martin.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:27 pm
by Martin Thoene
People said they wanted to see more pics, so here's 3 of them looking for food.
They're very good at searching around under the small stones, plus I've noticed they're somewhat intolerant of one another when looking for food.
Martin.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:47 pm
by Jim Powers
You must be a mind reader. I was just thinking of asking you how they are doing.
Obviously, they are doing well. They look like they have put on a little weight since the first pics.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:05 pm
by Martin Thoene
There are those who would say I am
Yes, they're a bit fatter. They (suprise, suprise) love Bloodworms.
Martin.
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:44 pm
by Mike Ophir
Wow very cool fish. Can I get an order of fry from you when/if they breed?
Mike