Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:14 pm
by chris1932
Emma your eyes are not playing tricks. It was a dried up angel fry. Must have been stuck in my transfer jar. I went and got it out last night. With my eye sight I am lucky to have seen it.
Thanks to everyone who comented so far. I respect and appreciate your advice as much now as I did when I was new here.
Martin, Emma, Jim, Helen, Graeme,and Mike you're the best. I am proud to be able to give something back.
I will be posting on the FW fourm. Check out my other babies.
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:57 pm
by shari2
Definitely too nice a tank to eliminate! Can't wait to see the saga as the little guy grows up.

Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:14 am
by LES..
Fantastic news Chris,
Martin has already pulled out my pictures of very young P.Cheni for comparison :-)
After having seen all of Emma's Sewellia fry pictures it does seem that all hillie young can look very similar when small. Given that this was found in the filter it would favour an egg scatterer like a Sewellia.
It would be nice to state that P.Cheni are easy to breed which would favour them but i think given that Cheni fry tend to stay buried in the substrate until markings become visible i think it would be unlikely that they would end up in your filter.
Speculation is fun but getting to see a fish develop is even more so, please post more pictures over the coming weeks :-)
LES..
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:48 am
by loachmom
Very exciting! Looking forward to more pictures.

Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:12 am
by Emma Turner
Hi again Chris,
The pics of my
Sewellia lineolata fry were taken only a few mins after being carefully removed from our Eheim external, which like your Fluval, is blackened out. I really don't think that is a
Sewellia fry there, not only does it lack the pigment, but it is far too orange in colour.
Please don't think about stripping down your river tank again! We
always enjoy hearing about it and seeing your pics, especially now that this has happened!
Emma
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:41 pm
by Emma Turner
I knew I had these pics somewhere! This is a
S. lineolata fry just seconds after discovery in a darkened Eheim external filter:
Highly pigmented, even though it had been living in total darkness.
Emma
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:20 pm
by chris1932
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:35 pm
by Jim Powers
That's quite a little belly on that guy.

My first thought at looking at this pic (besides the belly) is that it is a schistura, perhaps a baby sumo. But then again...
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:51 pm
by Emma Turner
Great pics Chris!
I can see a small amount of pigmentation in the dorsal fin, which
Beaufortia kweichowensis do have........not that this probably means anything!
Emma
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:36 am
by Martin Thoene
I can see where Jim is coming from with Schistura. I don't remember ever seeing a sucker-bodied hillstream plump up like that with eating, but of course Schistura do.
However, Chris doesn't have any in the tank. I'm thinking that we're in for another photographic journey of development like with Emma's Sewellia.
It would be so totally cool if it's one of the species Chris has that have not been bred before. My gut is with Emma's suggestion of Beaufortia. My second guess would be the Homaloptera.
Martin.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:42 am
by Jim Powers
Chris did mention further down in the post that he had some sumo loaches in the tank.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:50 am
by Martin Thoene
OH! I missed that. In that case I'm definitely with you on the Schistura Jim. In the first picture you can quite clearly see a keel on the top side of the caudal peduncle in front of the tail. This is a typical Nemacheiline feature.
And of course Sumos have that strong dorsal marking.
Martin.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:06 am
by helen nightingale
amazing photos Chris

that tank is much too nice to take down, and this is quite exciting.
i hope between all you hillie experts you can get it sussed soon

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:24 am
by chris1932
Have there been any recorded captive breedings of Schistura? I do have three of them in the river tank. I only see them at feeding time. This is exciting!
The little guy will eat till bloated only when fed live BBS. I have some feeding time videos that I have not had the chance to upload to photobucket.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:08 pm
by mikev
Hmm... It certainly has a Sumo belly
chris1932 wrote:Have there been any recorded captive breedings of Schistura? I do have three of them in the river tank. I only see them at feeding time. This is exciting!
S. Nicholsi, but there is no good account of it....maybe some other species too
Sumo's would quite likely be the first, both for the species and for a having an illustrated development process; so this is certainly a very nice achievement by you.
Please take as many photos as you can.