Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:38 pm
by The.Dark.One
I am summoned!
Nice pics and fish as always Emma.
Looking in 'A Photographic Guide to the Inland-water Fishes of Taiwan' I dont think they are H. formosanus. They seem to match the live photo images of Sinogastromyzon puliensis or S. nantaiensis. I will have a closer look and come back to you.

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:59 pm
by The.Dark.One
Although they are reminiscent of S. nantaiensis I think they are S. puliensis. To be certain I need a higher res image from the side as I need to count the (small!) lateral line scales!
I'm quite sure they are not H. formosanus.

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:47 pm
by Emma Turner
Thank you, Dark Lord. 8) I will try for a better image over the next few days. Last year, I did import some other balitorids under the S. puliensis nametag, and they were different again. :?

Emma

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:47 pm
by plaalye
I was looking at these S. puliensis on fishbase. They must be in the same tank with the H. formosanus, that's the same rock!
Image
Image

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:57 pm
by Emma Turner
Here are the loaches that came in as 'Giant Grey Suckers - S. puliensis'. One was much bigger than the rest (which is shown first) the rest looked slightly more spotted and more 'Beaufortia-like':

Image

The big one with one of the other more spotted looking fish:
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Emma

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:07 pm
by The.Dark.One
Hi Emma

I dont think those are S. puliensis, unless the Taiwan book is wrong but it is a very high quality publication. I will wait for your photos

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:34 pm
by Emma Turner
Still trying for pics, and this is the best I've been able to manage so far:

Image

The.Dark.One, I may have to put a specimen or two into my photo tank again for close-ups, as they are very secretive in the stock tank.

Emma

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:26 am
by The.Dark.One
Hi Emma

Yes please as it is difficult without close ups
Cheers

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 pm
by Emma Turner
TDO, did you notice the ad at the bottom of this thread? It was for 'Satanic jewellery'. :shock: :P

Edit: It's not there now, but it was!

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:04 pm
by The.Dark.One
Emma Turner wrote:TDO, did you notice the ad at the bottom of this thread? It was for 'Satanic jewellery'. :shock: :P

Edit: It's not there now, but it was!
My influence is everywhere........ :twisted:

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:25 pm
by Emma Turner
As promised, a couple of close-up images for TDO. I really hope these will be good enough for what's needed, let me know if you want me to email you the original large sized files:

Image

Image

Emma

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:03 pm
by The.Dark.One
Hi Emma

Yes, please send full sized images. Thes scales are so small it is hard to count.
Cheers

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:02 pm
by daspricey
Emma Turner wrote:TDO, did you notice the ad at the bottom of this thread? It was for 'Satanic jewellery'. :shock: :P

Edit: It's not there now, but it was!
Image

:lol:

Beautiful fish and photography as usual Emma! :)

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:25 pm
by The.Dark.One
Hi Emma
I got the images. Still very difficult to count the lateral line scales due to their small size. I have done the best I can do and based on the count I have done (or tried to!) they appear to be S. puliensis.
Cheers

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:07 pm
by Emma Turner
Thanks a million, TDO. 8) :D

Emma