Page 3 of 4
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:34 pm
by Emma Turner
It could be that the reason this fish appears to be 'sitting like a goby' is because there is no substrate in the tank...
Apart from the markings/overall colouration, it reminds me of
Sewellia, therefore, I'm still betting it's a
Beaufortia (and like Martin said earlier, second guess is
Homaloptera). I am thinking it's barbels would be more prominent if it were
Schistura, but you never know.
We shall see! Keep the pics coming, Chris!
Emma
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:18 pm
by Emma Turner
Chris, I was just thinking, I know you're keeping the fry tank bare-bottomed for hygeine reasons, but would you be willing to add a small flat pebble? It may seem like a strange request but the reason I'm asking is because just prior to both Sewellia lineolata and Sewellia sp. 'spotted' fry clinging to the glass, they first attempted to climb up onto small cobbles.
Emma
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:47 am
by chris1932
No new pictures today, I am thinking Schistrua more everyday.
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:47 am
by mikev
One argument for Schistura is that this is the species that is new, Beaufortia's were/are kept by a large number of people and no spawning reports were heard to date.
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:51 am
by chris1932
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:29 am
by Jim Powers
I'm staying with schistura.
How big is the little fella now?
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:46 am
by Mad Duff
Looking at that caudal peduncle I would say definitely
Schistura, its coming on very nicely Chris

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:49 pm
by mikev
Real nice!
Count the rays and compare with the adults. The baby has 8 in dorsal, how about the Sumo adults? If the number matches for both the dorsal and caudal fins, this is pretty much proven...
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:08 pm
by Emma Turner
Yep, as soon as I looked at that new pic and saw the caudal peduncle, I knew straight away that was a young
Schistura. Congratulations, Chris!
Out of interest, are you keeping the
Schistura cf. balteata (which have been around lately):
http://www.loaches.com/species-index/sc ... f-balteata (check through the photo gallery - lots of colour variations are available).
Or the regular
Schistura balteata?
http://www.loaches.com/species-index/schistura-balteata
Whichever it is, it's the first recorded successful breeding of this species in captivity. Well done!
Emma
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:47 pm
by shari2
and the barbels are fairly prominent in that first pic.
excellent stuff!
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:23 pm
by chris1932
After watching the fish for weeks behavior and motion is what gave it away for me. See for yourself.
http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l286/ ... V02260.flv
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:53 am
by loachmom
Emma Turner wrote:Whichever it is, it's the first recorded successful breeding of this species in captivity. Well done!

Congrats, Chris! That's wonderful!

Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:54 am
by Graeme Robson
Excellent looking
Schistura Chris!!
Again, Congratulations!
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:24 pm
by Emma Turner
Still like to know whether the adults are
Schistura balteata or
Schistura cf.
balteata.

Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:32 pm
by chris1932
Emma I believe they are cf. I will try and get you some pictures of the believed parents.