Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:48 pm
I see you modified the smaller diameter end and made it fit over 3/4" PVC. I think I will borrow that idea. (Thanks!)
I have found that these PH are not very stable because the large diameter end of the cone fits onto the PH with such a small overlap. Any way to make that part fit better, stronger?
Would there be significant increase in the flow if each PH was plumbed to 2 or more sponges? I am doing this with my filters, and have not noticed an increase in flow, but the sponges last longer between cleaning (more sponges, and the debris is spread out between them) There may be a pipe size issue with what I am doing, too. I had a lot of 1/2" PVC, sch 40 lying around, so set up things with that. I think I might see some increase in flow if I bought some 3/4" class 200 pipe. MUCH bigger ID.
I have found that these PH are not very stable because the large diameter end of the cone fits onto the PH with such a small overlap. Any way to make that part fit better, stronger?
Would there be significant increase in the flow if each PH was plumbed to 2 or more sponges? I am doing this with my filters, and have not noticed an increase in flow, but the sponges last longer between cleaning (more sponges, and the debris is spread out between them) There may be a pipe size issue with what I am doing, too. I had a lot of 1/2" PVC, sch 40 lying around, so set up things with that. I think I might see some increase in flow if I bought some 3/4" class 200 pipe. MUCH bigger ID.